« Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis | Main | negative campaigning is a mistake in '04 »

April 2, 2004

the Scholarly Communications Commons

(Bloomington, IN) The category of "scholarly communications" includes books and journal articles; datasets, maps, images, and software; and informal exchanges such as discussions at meetings, emails, blogs, gossip, and even resumes and letters of recommendation. Almost all of this material can now be digitized and stored perpetually for anyone to use. Knowledge is a "non-rivalrous" good; if I take some, there isn't less for you. In fact, it is often cumulative: knowledge is worth more the more it is used, and each item becomes more valuable the more other items are also available. Thus knowledge can function as a "commons," a public resource. On the other hand, there are problems. The main one is probably the "provisioning problem": finding a way to pay for, or otherwise encourage, the creation of free goods.

It's easy to envision better forms of scholarly communications than we have today. For example, imagine that journals gave their articles away free online. They'd have to cover editorial and electronic-storage costs, but imagine that they charged their prospective authors submission fees--and universities and funders covered those fees for their own employees/grantees. The total cost to universities would be much lower than under the current system, in which academic libraries pay expensive journal subscriptions. Moreover, anyone with an Internet connection could get free access to all the published information.

But--how can we move from our current system to this superior one? At present, every university must subscribe to major journals; and every budding scholar must submit his or her best articles to the same prestigious publications. Universities cannot easily come up with more money to pay submission fees to new "open-access" electronic journals. Besides, if they do pay submission fees, then other universities will benefit from the free scholarship without paying.

This is just one collective-action problem. Consider another: If scholars, universities and/or publishers post free online copies of copyrighted articles (as I do on this site), then who is responsible for keeping these copies online at stable addresses for the long term? How will this be paid for?

Peter Suber runs an excellent blog on these questions.

April 2, 2004 3:05 PM | category: Internet and public issues | Comments


Peter: Thanks for the overview of scholarly communication issues. I would be very curious to see papers from the conference or to hear other details. I poked around on the Workshop site, but find no reference to the Scholarly Communications Commons conference.

April 3, 2004 8:44 AM | Comments (4) | posted by Frederick Emrich

I imagine that you have no plans to attend ALA's Annual Conference in Orlando this June, but there will be a panel called "Open Access, Open Minds: Emerging Trends in Scholarly Information." From the description, it will be focused on two tools that may be highly useful for establishing a scholarly comm. commons: institutional repositories and the Creative Commons system/protocol.

April 3, 2004 8:24 PM | Comments (4) | posted by Eli

Before I could do it myself, Frederick has created links to all the papers that are available online. See http://www.info-commons.org/blog/archives/000410.html

April 3, 2004 9:03 PM | Comments (4) | posted by Peter Levine

It's a question of universities redefining their missions, and then creating administrative structures to support those modified missions. I think that MIT's OpenCourseWare initiative is a great experiment to contribute to a true academic commons in the field of engineering.

April 6, 2004 10:38 AM | Comments (4) | posted by Michael Weiksner

Site Meter